SEARCH

Body Fluid Analysis

Critical Results From an Irreplaceable Sample

Cerebrospinal, synovial, pleural and peritoneal fluid often fall outside automated analyzers’ counting range and so a manual method is required. Technologists count cells and identify them, often from a sample that’s a fraction of a milliliter. Many of these samples are only drawn once, which is exactly why a quality control such as Cell-Chex® matters so much here — there is rarely a second sample to fall back on.

Body Fluid Testing

How QC Creates Value for Body Fluid Testing

Quality control touches nearly every step of a manual body fluid workflow, from the moment a technologist loads the hemacytometer to the number that reaches the chart. The three areas below are where laboratories tend to see it matter most.

Verifying Manual Counting

Certain body fluids may fall outside the range automated analyzers can count, so they’re counted and differentiated manually under a microscope. A control designed specifically for manual methods, such as Cell-Chex, gives the technologist a known result to check the count against before the patient value is reported.

Reducing Interobserver Variability

Manual counting methods are subject to significant interobserver variability. A study has shown that five technologists counting the same four CSF samples produced coefficients of variation as high as 91% at low cell concentrations.1

Accounting for Cell Morphology

Unlike a chemistry control, a body fluid control has to give the observer real cells and real crystals at the low-positive range. The low-positive range is also where manual identification is hardest, which is exactly why a control that challenges morphology is important.

CAP expects laboratories to run appropriate QC on manual body fluid cell counts, and it allows several ways to meet that expectation. The comparison below shows what each option can and cannot tell you:

Control materialReference ValueCrystal ID
Assayed liquid control (Cell-Chex)Yes — manufacturer-assignedYes — real urate/CPPD crystals
Previously assayed patient sample, ran in duplicateNo — technique checked against itself onlyRarely — most samples carry no crystals
Procedural controlNo — confirms the process ran, not the number it producedNo

Evidence

The Interobserver Problem, Measured

At a mean of 0.6 cells per microliter, the manual coefficient of variation across five blinded technologists was 91 percent; even at 63.2 cells per microliter, it was 45 percent.1

See the study →

Scientific Research

Crystal ID Responds to Training

In a reliability study of general (untrained) light-microscopy observers, mean sensitivity for crystal identification was 69% for urate and 82 percent for CPPD.2 In a separate study designed specifically to test the effect of a structured training program, blinded examination after training reached 95.3 percent sensitivity for urate and 92.7 percent for CPPD.3 CPPD remained the weaker call in both studies.

See the data →


1. Sandhaus LM, et al. A New Automated Technology for Cerebrospinal Fluid Cell Counts. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2017;147(5):507–514. 2. Gordon C, Swan A, Dieppe P. Detection of crystals in synovial fluids by light microscopy: sensitivity and reliability. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1989;48(9):737–742. 3. Ortiz-Bravo E, et al. Analysis for crystals in synovial fluid: training of the analysts results in high consistency. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2005;64(4):612–615.

Standards & Evidence

Manual testing methods are subject to variability and thus highlight the importance of utilizing quality controls to ensure patient results. Below are links to published data and technical documents to support your laboratory’s QC program.

Products

IVD · FDA

ClearedCE-IVD

Cell-Chex®

Multi-level manual control for hemocytometer counts. Assayed for a 5-part WBC differential and contains urate/CPPD crystals. 30-day open-vial stability and 6-month closed-vial stability.

View levels →

Documentation & Standards

Current package insert, assay sheets, and certificates of conformance by lot. Plus the CLIA control-frequency requirement and CLSI H56-A consensus standard.

Download →

Resources

CLIA 42 CFR 493.1269

The manual hemocytometer control-frequency requirement, in full, on eCFR.

Read the regulation →

CLSI H56-A

The consensus standard for body fluid cellular composition analysis.

View at CLSI →

STATS® ILQC

Interlaboratory program to benchmark your laboratory’s performance against peer groups.

Explore STATS →

Partner With Streck

Leading instrument manufacturers partner with Streck to provide their customers with dependable third-party quality controls. Streck is the leader in cell stabilization for over 50 years and continues to manufacture and develop high performing controls.

  • Sophisticated R&D to rapidly develop products
  • Advanced QC, with barcoded solutions and included ILQC program for increased value
  • Highly trained technical and sales support

Built for the Hardest Call

Streck manufactures Cell-Chex from stabilized human cells and real urate and CPPD crystals so a technologist can verify the count, the differential, and the crystal identification against material with assigned values, handled exactly as a patient specimen is.